Woman has no right over her own body

[Old Man Marsh]

[Ferdinand]

"A woman has no right over her own body, it belongs to god"  

Really?  So this must means a woman's uterus belongs to god.  Which also means we can blame god for the 1 in 4 miscarriages that take place in all pregnancies.  This inturn means god aborts millions of babies a year. Which also means god runs the largest abortion clinic on the planet Earth.  It all makes sense now.  

I mean, if a woman’s body belongs to god, god kind of also gave us free will and the ability to have abortions, among other things to enforce our free will and even save our lives, so would that also mean god endorsed abortions?

Maybe god is a guy I can get behind 

[Dānu]

No one is dragging women kicking and screaming, away from abortion clinics. Nor is anyone revoking Roe.

What is obvious though, is that Life is ever becoming diminished, and cheap.

There is no respect for human Life. Especially for infants, and the elderly.... because of "inconvenience".

And the disrespect doesn’t go unnoticed by our children. The insensitivity is handed down, and taken to
new levels of callous behavior.

And where does it end? Who would’ve thought even a decade ago; that infanticide would be an acceptable form of abortion?
Leaving a born alive baby, on a gurney, or in a bucket to die. Alone.

Hideous.

If one has that inhuman right? Another, should at least have the right to speak against it. Because none have the legal physical means to stop it.

The typical bullshit talking points you swallow go straight through you like shit through a goose and come out the other end, don't they?

The children now love luxury; they have bad manners, contempt for authority; they show disrespect for elders and love chatter in place of exercise. Children are now tyrants, not the servants of their households. They no longer rise when elders enter the room. They contradict their parents, chatter before company, gobble up dainties at the table, cross their legs, and tyrannize their teachers.

~ Attributed to Socrates (469–399 B.C.), (Quote Investigator)

It should give you some pause that people have been sounding the alarm since time immemorial and yet the sky hasn't fallen. I have a hunch it won't.

[Alan V]

No one is dragging women kicking and screaming, away from abortion clinics. Nor is anyone revoking Roe.

Anti-abortionists would if they could, and they are trying to undercut women's rights in other ways too.  Don't you read the news?

What is obvious though, is that Life is ever becoming diminished, and cheap.

You are saying this in the U.S., where human life is valued so highly?  Take your argument to Africa, India, or China, where over-population diminishes the value of human lives.

There is no respect for human Life. Especially for infants, and the elderly.... because of "inconvenience".

And the disrespect doesn’t go unnoticed by our children. The insensitivity is handed down, and taken to
new levels of callous behavior.

A slippery slope argument.

And where does it end? Who would’ve thought even a decade ago; that infanticide would be an acceptable form of abortion?
Leaving a born alive baby, on a gurney, or in a bucket to die. Alone.

A strawman argument, another fallacy.  I now know you enjoy feeling morally superior, and are willing to lie about others to feel that way.

So much for Christian morality....

[Tres Leches]

No one is dragging women kicking and screaming, away from abortion clinics. Nor is anyone revoking Roe.

False.
Your post has so many levels of intellectual dishonesty it can be quickly dismissed out of hand. People like you will never win or gain control over my body. Never. 

-Teresa

[SYZ]

...And where does it end? Who would’ve thought even a decade ago; that infanticide would be an acceptable form of abortion?
Leaving a born alive baby, on a gurney, or in a bucket to die. Alone.

I'm not sure from where you got this notion of abortion being the equivalent of infanticide.
Infanticide is defined legally as the act of deliberately causing the death of a very young child
under 12 months of age.

The termination of a pregnancy is carried out on a non-viable foetus.  In other words there is no
child involved.

Personally, I think this connection you've endeavoured to establish is absurd, and only reinforces
the dark ages opinions of the  Arkansas megachurch pastor Jeff Crawford, who, incidentally is not
a biologist, nor a scientist, nor even a medical doctor.  He does not, and cannot know the technical
intricacies of any clinical procedure, or the psychology of the woman intimately involved or her
reasons for the termination.  If a live birth would kill the mother, apparently you'd be more than
happy with that in order to ensure the newborn's life?   Seriously mate?

[brewerb]

No one is dragging women kicking and screaming, away from abortion clinics. Nor is anyone revoking Roe.

What is obvious though, is that Life is ever becoming diminished, and cheap.

There is no respect for human Life. Especially for infants, and the elderly.... because of "inconvenience".

And the disrespect doesn’t go unnoticed by our children. The insensitivity is handed down, and taken to
new levels of callous behavior.

And where does it end? Who would’ve thought even a decade ago; that infanticide would be an acceptable form of abortion?
Leaving a born alive baby, on a gurney, or in a bucket to die. Alone.

Hideous.

If one has that inhuman right? Another, should at least have the right to speak against it. Because none have the legal physical means to stop it.

I see you're not much of a history buff. 

Or maybe you are, it's just a revisionist apologist history.

[Fireball]

No one is dragging women kicking and screaming, away from abortion clinics. Nor is anyone revoking Roe.

False.
Your post has so many levels of intellectual dishonesty it can be quickly dismissed out of hand. People like you will never win or gain control over my body. Never. 

-Teresa

I'm kind of puzzled how people like ronedee with such a low level of reasoning skill can function in society, let alone post (at least semi-cogently) on the internet. It just boggles my mind. Must be a parrot like drainy? 

[Tres Leches]

No one is dragging women kicking and screaming, away from abortion clinics. Nor is anyone revoking Roe.

False.
Your post has so many levels of intellectual dishonesty it can be quickly dismissed out of hand. People like you will never win or gain control over my body. Never. 

-Teresa

I'm kind of puzzled how people like ronedee with such a low level of reasoning skill can function in society, let alone post (at least semi-cogently) on the internet. It just boggles my mind. Must be a parrot like drainy? 

It's the old New Yorker cartoon - "On the internet nobody knows you're a dog".

-Teresa

[Fireball]

False.
Your post has so many levels of intellectual dishonesty it can be quickly dismissed out of hand. People like you will never win or gain control over my body. Never. 

-Teresa

I'm kind of puzzled how people like ronedee with such a low level of reasoning skill can function in society, let alone post (at least semi-cogently) on the internet. It just boggles my mind. Must be a parrot like drainy? 

It's the old New Yorker cartoon - "On the internet nobody knows you're a dog".

-Teresa

Or a pencil-armed 14 year-old boy with a great command of invective. 

[Tres Leches]

I'm kind of puzzled how people like ronedee with such a low level of reasoning skill can function in society, let alone post (at least semi-cogently) on the internet. It just boggles my mind. Must be a parrot like drainy? 

It's the old New Yorker cartoon - "On the internet nobody knows you're a dog".

-Teresa

Or a pencil-armed 14 year-old boy with a great command of invective. 

Or a cat with opposable thumbs.
Meow.

-Teresa

[ronedee]

...And where does it end? Who would’ve thought even a decade ago; that infanticide would be an acceptable form of abortion?
Leaving a born alive baby, on a gurney, or in a bucket to die. Alone.

I'm not sure from where you got this notion of abortion being the equivalent of infanticide.
Infanticide is defined legally as the act of deliberately causing the death of a very young child
under 12 months of age.

The termination of a pregnancy is carried out on a non-viable foetus.  In other words there is no
child involved.

Personally, I think this connection you've endeavoured to establish is absurd, and only reinforces
the dark ages opinions of the  Arkansas megachurch pastor Jeff Crawford, who, incidentally is not
a biologist, nor a scientist, nor even a medical doctor.  He does not, and cannot know the technical
intricacies of any clinical procedure, or the psychology of the woman intimately involved or her
reasons for the termination.  If a live birth would kill the mother, apparently you'd be more than
happy with that in order to ensure the newborn's life?   Seriously mate?

What's this... Swiss Cheese?

[NorthernBen]

I do wonder why women put up with their horseshit.

Ladies?

It's one of the reasons why I dumped religion. Anyone who thinks they control my uterus doesn't deserve my attention.

-Teresa

The woman's uterus.. A very serious topic. I for one would never joke about it, Period.

[Chas]

...And where does it end? Who would’ve thought even a decade ago; that infanticide would be an acceptable form of abortion?
Leaving a born alive baby, on a gurney, or in a bucket to die. Alone.

I'm not sure from where you got this notion of abortion being the equivalent of infanticide.
Infanticide is defined legally as the act of deliberately causing the death of a very young child
under 12 months of age.

The termination of a pregnancy is carried out on a non-viable foetus.  In other words there is no
child involved.

Personally, I think this connection you've endeavoured to establish is absurd, and only reinforces
the dark ages opinions of the  Arkansas megachurch pastor Jeff Crawford, who, incidentally is not
a biologist, nor a scientist, nor even a medical doctor.  He does not, and cannot know the technical
intricacies of any clinical procedure, or the psychology of the woman intimately involved or her
reasons for the termination.  If a live birth would kill the mother, apparently you'd be more than
happy with that in order to ensure the newborn's life?   Seriously mate?

What's this... Swiss Cheese?

You very clearly did not understand what was said. 

The only Swiss cheese here is your brain.

[Fireball]

I'm not sure from where you got this notion of abortion being the equivalent of infanticide.
Infanticide is defined legally as the act of deliberately causing the death of a very young child
under 12 months of age.

The termination of a pregnancy is carried out on a non-viable foetus.  In other words there is no
child involved.

Personally, I think this connection you've endeavoured to establish is absurd, and only reinforces
the dark ages opinions of the  Arkansas megachurch pastor Jeff Crawford, who, incidentally is not
a biologist, nor a scientist, nor even a medical doctor.  He does not, and cannot know the technical
intricacies of any clinical procedure, or the psychology of the woman intimately involved or her
reasons for the termination.  If a live birth would kill the mother, apparently you'd be more than
happy with that in order to ensure the newborn's life?   Seriously mate?

What's this... Swiss Cheese?

You very clearly did not understand what was said. 

The only Swiss cheese here is your brain.

Xtian spongeform encephalitis.