Historical Jesus, Biblical Jesus

[Free]

That's not at all true.  Folklorists and psychologists have studied the way that oral culture works and the way that myth and legend develops, and, we have considerable knowledge about the ancient near east as well as comparative examples of other myths and legends to compare the Jesus phenomena with.  So to say that we have no evidence to support the mythicist hypothesis is simply mistaken.  There probably are other things one can point to in order to support the hypothesis, but that is sufficient to put this notion that there is no evidence for the mythicist position to rest.  Additionally, this seems to be an example of a fallacious attempt to shift the burden of proof.  It is not the mythicist's obligation to prove that Jesus didn't happen, but rather that the evidence for a historical Jesus has explanations that are sufficiently probable to make the so-called evidence moot.  Asking the mythicist to prove that something didn't happen simply makes it look like you don't really understand the issues involved.

There is no evidence to support the position that Jesus is wholly myth. 

None.

It doesn't matter what other cultures have done to ascertain the mythical status of anyone or anything else. That is completely unrelated. Just because a mythical status has been ascribed to one character has nothing to do with it be ascribed to another completely different character in a completely different culture. The establishment of Zeus, for example, as being a myth is completely unrelated to Jesus.

Each evaluation stands on its own, and are not dependent on each other for the simple reason they are all unrelated.