(01-26-2019, 06:06 AM)Chas Wrote:(01-26-2019, 05:14 AM)jerry mcmasters Wrote:(01-26-2019, 05:02 AM)Minimalist Wrote: And if you ever gave some "evidence" we'd have something to talk about.
And yet, I'm still waiting for you to say something intelligent or point to any actual evidence. You really ought to try that before calling anyone else a dumb cunt..... fuckhead.
Why can't the NT be considered evidence? Evidence that there were wandering wonder-workers in that time and place?
Is the Bhagavad Gita evidence? If not, then the NT isn't either. If you think it is, that is special pleading.
I don't know much about the Bhagavad Gita, I will look into that. My initial thought is that the circumstances and evidence is of greatly different quality but I don't know. Is the Koran evidence of a real man named Mohammed? If you think so, then you must be guilty of special pleading to then say the NT isn't evidence of real Jesus.