(12-11-2018, 09:13 PM)JesseB Wrote:(12-11-2018, 05:10 PM)SteveII Wrote:(12-11-2018, 03:49 PM)Dancefortwo Wrote: Criminal, civil courts, family courts, toss out personal experiences that are NOT verified by several other sources or lack physical evidence to back up the claim. All lawyers are aware of this. News reporters are legally required to use the word "alleged" when referring to a serious crime that took place, that is until the person in question is convicted in a court of law. After that they don't use the word "alleged". If the report is about a cat stuck up in a tree, Girl Scout cookies or some other fluffy topic, nobody cares.
Government meetings heavily revolve around documents and laws, not personal experience. Business meetings revolve around documented money.....how much money is gong out, how much is returning, what's the profit margin, not personal experience.
No courts don't "toss out personal experiences" but it doesn't matter because you proved your own argument wrong. It would seem from your statement that if more people report the same experience, then we are good to go. Seems my premises are on solid ground!
More people didn't report your experience, your now basically creating a scenario where in a court I say well 500 people saw the event and they all know I'm innocent. WELL IF 500 PEOPLE SAW IT AND KNOW YOU"RE INNOCENT IT MUST BE TRUE.
Wait a second...... can we um.... talk.... to these eyewitnesses? Or are you just going to claim it?
What are you talking about? There is two different conversations going on. One about the 500 witnesses in 1 Cor and the other is about whether personal experience is evidence. No one tried to merge them into one.
