(12-11-2018, 03:52 AM)Dancefortwo Wrote:(12-10-2018, 08:07 PM)SteveII Wrote: The purpose of this inductive exercise it to explain my reasons to believe.
You're not using inductive reasoning....
Sylvia Wassertheil-Smoller says: "In science, there's a constant interplay between inductive inference—based on
observations—and deductive inference—based on theory. As a theist, you're limited to deductive reasoning,
as it's (obviously) impossible for you to cite any of your observations. You're simply constructing an indeterminate
theory based on ancient, questionable third-party hearsay.
Quote:You also haven't responded to my question in post #403.
Nor has Steve addressed my earlier question: "Can you please list some of those pieces of information that
constitute evidence, and which would prove your claim of miracles? If you have, please point me there."
Like a lot of theists, when he's backed into a corner, he simply avoids answering any direct, specific questions. Pathetic.
I'm a creationist; I believe that man created God.