Historical Jesus, Biblical Jesus

[EvieTheAvocado]

here you've totally abandoned the conversation you started with, equivocating what you are talking about
I started with historical jesus and biblical jesus
non biblical jesus? wtf are you taking about?
another invented character? what is the source for this incantation?
but you don't have to answer that because it doesn't really pertain to a historical jesus or a biblical jesus.
jesus fucking christ

I didn't equivocate once. Show me where I did.

I changed my terms because you were struggling to make sense of the terms I originally used. I was trying to help you see what I was getting at.

Yes, you started with historical Jesus and Biblical Jesus. I explained the difference. You wanted more explanations. I tried and you still didn't get it. So then I started talking about Biblical and non-Biblical Jesus to signify the difference between a Jesus that is exactly how he was described in the Bible and a Jesus that is only slightly as described in the Bible (which is why later in the same post I said non-fully-Biblical Jesus) ... yes, that is an awkward way to describe things ... but I was trying another angle because you seemed unable to grasp the most simple and straightfoward way of describing things.

What do you mean another invented character? All characters are invented. All definitions are made up.

I am saying that if Jesus did exist he wasn't a literal Biblical interpretation of Jesus that involves Jesus actually having supernatural powers and the ability to perform miracles and raise from the dead. What part of that is so difficult to understand?

What do you mean it doesn't pertain to the Biblical Jesus or a historical Jesus?

Get your head around this: If Jesus existed at all, if there was any historical Jesus at all, he was not the miracle performing supernatural Jesus described in the Bible. Can you get your head around that or are you going to keep acting like a whiny little child who can't even write properly?