Once again you fail to address the question of why you, and those exegetes you idolize, pick those particular items out of one book and insist that those are the real deal while simultaneously denouncing the rest of the book as fucking horseshit.
You know, there is one very significant difference between your precious gospels and Goldilocks. We know who wrote Goldilocks, where and when. You cannot say the same.
"Historicity" requires historical evidence. You have nothing of the sort.
You know, there is one very significant difference between your precious gospels and Goldilocks. We know who wrote Goldilocks, where and when. You cannot say the same.
"Historicity" requires historical evidence. You have nothing of the sort.
Robert G. Ingersoll : “No man with a sense of humor ever founded a religion.”
