Historical Jesus, Biblical Jesus

[eider]

If there was a Jesus, he was a nobody, ... yet another wandering Galilean peasant saying the end-times were nigh.

He got himself a bit of a name during a number of months in early 1st century Jewish provinces.
And today I hear folks talking about 'end times' quite often.

I don't read your stuff often, but that caught my eye. Let's see what other junk you've written.......

No one "recorded" anything he said. Ever. At the time no one knew what was going to happen to him. Even a week later,
no one would have remembered anything he said. No one wrote it down. It wasn't recorded by any means known.
Most of the disciples were illiterate. THAT's the "context".

Uneducated junk from you......again.
Communities with little or no literacy have amazingly increased memories. We know that (but you didn't!).
Memories can be held in mind for decades.......and then told or written.

How could anyone remember a sermon on the mount or a sermon
on the plane (    ) decades later. It's totally improbable. They made it up.

This your evidence for 'it's all junk', eh?
HJ research doesn't focus intensely upon the Sermon on the Mount. That's HC research. 
I remember lessons heard from several decades ago..... clear as if heard today.
Folks (mostly) couldn't remember a long speech, it's true, but remember important details exactly.

BUT ... the content in the gospels is a) highly developed theology in many places -
which would have taken decades to mature and evolve, (a lot of it "placed" ie a literary device *in the mouth* of Jesus), and b), the major thematic content of the gospels (post temple destruction ie "only 2 commandments ... love God and love your neighbor") discusses and addresses the concerns of Rabbinic Judaism in the LATE 1st Century, AFTER the temple was gone, and it was no longer possible to "keep the law", ... not the early 1st Century when it was still standing. The diaspora had already begun and they were working out what it meant to even be a Jew at all with no temple.

Highly developed from what, eh?   From something real and temporal that happened? 
Your waffling on about Historical Christianity! Wake up!


You claim to be an expert in ancient Semitic languages...... how about you look through your notes, dictionaries etc and give the Eastern Aramaic word for 'anchor'? That would be useful.