Historical Jesus, Biblical Jesus

[Free]

LMAO. More evasion. 
It may be etched in stone, but I said nothing about Vespasian and Titus. Nothing there. You made it up because you assumed incorrectly. 
The Messiah of War and the Messiah of Peace was what I actually had in mind when I wrote that, 
but what I said was there are examples of where ("exactly")  two messiahs were recognized in a culture. I said nothing about Vespasian and Titus.

And like I said, the context of my post was about Vespasian and Titus being two messiahs., and your reply was "yes, ... exactly two messiahs."

What's anybody supposed to thing of that? You didn't dispute that in the next post, so what are we supposed to think?

The real question is, why is it, you can't support the Testimonium you always employ as historical evidence for Jesus, 
and why are you evading that ... with all this bullshit evasion ?

Because as I have constantly said, I agree with the vast majority of scholars that the TF was altered from it's original, and that original still said something about Jesus called Christ.

Nothing evasive about it. I have said it numerous times in this thread.

Josephus died in Rome in the year 100 CE.
Origen was a Church Father. He lived in the 2nd and 3rd Centuries.
He taught that Jesus was not divine, (not a god).
In Hebrew culture there were many non-god but still "divine beings". The Heavenly Host.
In hebrew culture it was unthinkable that any Jew would say that a human had status equal to Yahweh's.
It was a stoning offense.

Yet in the Testimonium, we have the fake Josephus saying "if it is even right to call him a man", (ie divine).
The concept is in the wrong time, (WAY too early ... the divinity of Jesus was made doctrine at the Council of Ephesus),
and in the wrong culture. No Jew would say that.

Josephus could not have written the Testimonium.

And that is part of why the majority of scholars agree that the TF was altered somewhat from the original, and it rather most likely resembled what we see in the Arabic translation.

What kind of an argument are you expecting here?

I think I will be the judge of what I said and meant. I said nothing about Vespasian and Titus.
You made it up.  

Ta ta

You responded to my question of Vespasian and Titus being two messiahs with "yes, ... exactly two messiahs."

And now you're just trying to lie your way out of a fuckup.

Oh how much easier it would be to just so, "Oh ... sorry. I wasn't responding to that. Sorry for the confusion."

Hilarious.