Historical Jesus, Biblical Jesus

[Free]

Hw was involved with Rome in a number of issues with respect to the Jews in Jerusalem. 
If in fact, a Roman had executed a Jew who was said to be the "King of the Jews", one would expect he would have mentioned it.

And I wonder how many other messianic pretenders got strung up that we don't know about? You are making an argument for this Jesus fellow having widespread fame at the time of his execution.

Any evidence of that?

I most certainly am not. You made that up. And you yourself just made my point. 
We don't know about other messianic pretenders as their followers/believers died out. 
Were Josephus and Tacitus talking about him when he was executed ? No they were not. 
They talked about him later, after his believer group had grown. Their discussion of him is belief based ... on the believer base that had arisen.
If he had no believers, they would not have even mentioned him, as he would have been just like all the other messianic pretenders, which you brought up. Thank you !

Yes you are making that argument by implication alone. You suggested that if "a Roman had executed a Jew who was said to be the "King of the Jews" ..." then that implies obvious fame. 

So where do you get this historical information from where Jesus was regarded as "King of the Jews?"

The Gospels? You know ... those books that were purportedly written at least 3 decades after Philo was long dead?

lol

True believer.

LOL