(12-17-2019, 05:53 PM)Free Wrote: Which brings us to the same question regarding a god.
There is simply no difference between an invisible, incorporeal omni-everything god and no god at all.
Hence, the positive claim that there is no god at all is not only justified, but proven via the lack of evidence, which supplies us with actual evidence of absence.
Nothing is proven. Nothing.
Your claim that it's proven by lack of evidence does not follow from the fact that, at the moment, you have no evidence, or do not accept what many consider, to be evidence. Your lack supplies you with nothing. You have not proven that you should have objective evidence ... ie you have not demonstrated that what you are claiming as "absence" is both actually absence and that what your opinion claims as absence, is evidence.
Test
