Historical Jesus, Biblical Jesus

[Free]

Does it even OCCUR to you that none of your arguments are based on any evidence at all?  And do you realize that all the biblical texts were written after the supposed fact?

What has occurred to me is that you haven't checked out a single thing in my 1 to 8 list because I know that if you did you would know that everything I said is actually supported by historical records and historical consensus.

So, you know, there's that. And if Min or Bucky are any good at all with this they will acknowledge that everything I said is factually demonstrable.

I did read your list.  The illogic was rather painful (laughing hard is not good for rib muscles).  The problem is that nothing you offer is actually evidential.  While there are no actual civic records about Paul, according to several Church Fathers and apocryphal books, "Paul was beheaded in Rome by orders of Nero", "The Bible does not tell us the exact time or manner of the apostle Paul's death", and "he was crucified upside down".  

Rather opposing stories...

You read nothing, verified nothing, and your opinion amounts to nothing. Here's the very first thing:

1. Which came first, the letters of Paul, or the Gospels?

Paul's letters predate the Gospels.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pauline_epistles

https://www.patheos.com/blogs/kermitzarl...c-gospels/

https://forums.catholic.com/t/were-st-pa...s/281481/2

Try researching instead of asserting, dumbass.