(09-20-2019, 03:31 PM)Free Wrote:(09-20-2019, 07:44 AM)madog Wrote:(09-20-2019, 04:35 AM)Free Wrote:
Yes I'm for real, and you're a joke. The required context and supporting previous posts were all there for anyone to understand the point of the post. It was totally relevant to eliminating Pliny the Younger and any other known Christian sources of the time period of the writing of Annals as all known sources of the time period pointed to the spelling as being "Christian."
But of course your denialist brain prohibited you from comprehending anything that contradicts your denialist point of view.
So you could't supply a single example where a Christian source, at the time of or prior too the life of Tacitus, used the spelling Christians?
Please don't spam us again with writings from after the death of Tacitus ... I doubt Tacitus was a time traveller, Prophet or future seer
Lovely! Atypical Mythicist fallacious behavior; refuse to address the post in front of you, and then move the goal-post with a diversion to something else.
Now ... isn't that precisely what you are doing? But of course it is! When your argument has been defeated to the point of ridicule, you absolutely need to divert from it and then move another goalpost.
I am thoroughly convinced that ... dude ... you're a fraud, and fucking retarded.
You certainly out do me on insults ... shame you can't find some evidence to back up your rhetoric